Categories: CryptoNews

What Are Bitfinex And BitGo Hiding From The Public?

Over the past 24 hours, there has been plenty of speculation regarding the involvement of BitGo in the Bitfinex hack. Interestingly enough, the company seems to get away scot-free, as their internal investigation revealed no breach. But at the same time, they are the responsible party for co-signing every transaction taking place on the exchange platform. In theory, this makes them liable for any losses sustained.

BitGo Must Pay The Piper For The Bitfinex Incident

For those who are unaware, BitGo provides multi-signature cold storage solutions for Bitcoin transactions only. Even though Bitfinex deals with multiple fiat and crypto currencies, only Bitcoin balances were affected by the hack. Since BitGo has to co-sign every transaction, the question becomes how secure their solution is, to begin with.

To make matters even more confusing, Bitfinex does not seem to be inclined to hold BitGo responsible for their role in this theft either. The company has mentioned their internal investigation is not over yet, but they have come to the conclusion “the incident is their own fault.” That seems a rather strange statement, as it is evident BitGo did not perform their job adequately either.



One possible explanation is how Bitfinex did not properly implement BitGo on their end. Interestingly enough, the exchange quickly noted how they uncovered the exact way this breach had taken place, to begin with. That could mean they knew something was designed to fail from day one.

Related Post

Regardless of how the agreement between BitGo and BitFinex works exactly, it is evident both parties are liable for the stolen funds. All of the platform users were under the impression BitGO would secure their funds at all costs, and that has not happened. After all, it was their solution which only protects Bitcoin which was affected by this breach.

The Bitcoin community seems to be divided over this debacle for sure. Some people feel BitGo is ultimately responsible, regardless of how their clients want to have the solution implemented. Others say Bitfinex should pay up for their own mistakes.  Either way, both companies have a lot of explaining to do, and no one should let BitGo off the hook that easily.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

The Calculated Collapse of $TG: How a “Utility” Token Was Engineered for a Rug Pull

In the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency, new tokens launch daily, each one a shining beacon…

1 day ago

Staked Ethereum Hits Record High as Whale Accumulation Signals Bullish Long-Term Sentiment

Once more, Ethereum is commanding the spotlight as fresh figures indicate that the amount of…

1 day ago

Arbitrum Sees Surge in Protocol Revenue and EIP-7702 Adoption Following ArbOS 40 Upgrade

The ecosystem on Arbitrum keeps flaunting its robust foundations, with a steady incline in the…

1 day ago

Ethereum Whale Accumulation Surges as Long-Term Confidence Outweighs Short-Term Volatility

Once again, major market players are focusing on Ethereum. The whale activity surrounding the second-largest…

4 days ago

Week in AI: Fartcoin Steals the Spotlight Amid Market Turmoil

It has been a tumultuous week for the artificial intelligence sector in crypto. Sharp valuation…

5 days ago

BSC Foundation Resumes Strategic Accumulation: VIXBT, CAKE, LISTA, and MOOLAH Under Spotlight

Following a brief stint of dormancy, the BSC Foundation is back in action, reestablishing its strategic…

6 days ago