Categories: CryptoNews

Vendor Using BitPay Becomes Victim of Five Bitcoin Double-spend Attacks

One particular online Bitcoin shop was the victim of several double-spend attacks while using BitPay as a payment processor. While BitPay lets merchants accept payments as “completed’ at zero- network confirmations, it is still; possible to double-spend funds. This highlights the need for payment processor ‘insurance’ all transactions will be honoured when dealing with zero-confirmation payments.

A Bitcoin Double-spend For US$20

According to the Reddit post, this online shop sells in-game items, mainly for CS: GO. Throughout the years, this game has become increasingly popular. Gamers are always looking for the newest skins to show off. Some of these items can go for several hundred dollars on the market.

Due to the correlation between Bitcoin and gaming purchases, the online shop signed up for BitPay as a cryptocurrency payment processors. This means the shop will always receive the funds, and payments are deemed complete once they are visible on the blockchain. In most cases, this would not be a reason for concern, as most transactions go through without a hitch.

But things started going astray not too long ago, as several double-spend transactions were recorded. While this will not cause financial losses to the store, it is an intriguing event. Most people would not even consider double-spending to be an issue for small purchases. Then again, with next to zero costs associated with an attempted zero-confirmation double-spend, it is always worth a shot to some people.

Related Post

At the same time, people have to keep in mind a zero-confirmation double spend has no 100% success rate either. It is certainly possible to do so without much technical knowledge. However, the particular buyer in this case managed to successfully to do so for all five transactions, which is rather worrisome.

All of this goes to show Bitcoin payment processors will need to work on denying double-spend attacks from happening. For now, BitPay is not even using replace-by-fee yet, which would only make the problem worse. Thankfully, these attacks will not work for buying physical goods, as those transactions usually verified more carefully.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

The Calculated Collapse of $TG: How a “Utility” Token Was Engineered for a Rug Pull

In the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency, new tokens launch daily, each one a shining beacon…

20 hours ago

Staked Ethereum Hits Record High as Whale Accumulation Signals Bullish Long-Term Sentiment

Once more, Ethereum is commanding the spotlight as fresh figures indicate that the amount of…

20 hours ago

Arbitrum Sees Surge in Protocol Revenue and EIP-7702 Adoption Following ArbOS 40 Upgrade

The ecosystem on Arbitrum keeps flaunting its robust foundations, with a steady incline in the…

20 hours ago

Ethereum Whale Accumulation Surges as Long-Term Confidence Outweighs Short-Term Volatility

Once again, major market players are focusing on Ethereum. The whale activity surrounding the second-largest…

4 days ago

Week in AI: Fartcoin Steals the Spotlight Amid Market Turmoil

It has been a tumultuous week for the artificial intelligence sector in crypto. Sharp valuation…

5 days ago

BSC Foundation Resumes Strategic Accumulation: VIXBT, CAKE, LISTA, and MOOLAH Under Spotlight

Following a brief stint of dormancy, the BSC Foundation is back in action, reestablishing its strategic…

6 days ago