In the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency, new tokens launch daily, each one a shining beacon of innovation, community engagement, and long-term value.
But sometimes, these beacons shine light on something far less noble. The recent unraveling of $TG—a token that was purportedly anchored in utility and growth—was an occasion in which a deck was stacked against investors, with rules set to favor the house. Even with these advantages, the perpetrators of $TG needed the cover of its enshrined idiom in order to succeed.
At launch, $TG didn’t shout “meme coin.” It set itself up as a utility token on a clear mission: community-driven development, long-term value, and unique tokenomics. Let’s break that down a little. Now, community-driven development is a pretty neat idea. How many times have you wished you could directly influence the development of a product you use? If a community token can get a developing team to listen to it, then all power to the community.
At the heart of this trap lay the bonding curve, a mechanism used to control token supply and price via a smart contract. Although bonding curves are not malicious in and of themselves, they can be manipulated—and were in the case of $TG.
Right after launch, the developer of $TG utilized a bundler to buy up almost the whole bonding curve, doing so via 18 distinct wallets. This created the appearance of an early, diverse interest in the token. But it was later discovered that all 18 wallets were controlled by the same entities that controlled the developer wallet. There is little doubt that they were also using that wallet to accumulate a large amount of total token supply.
Once the bonding curve was cornered, the developer started the second phase of their plan—simulated distribution. Minuscule amounts of $TG were sent to a new group of wallets, again making it look like fresh, organic growth from different users entering the project. But these wallets were just another part of the same controlled network. It was all a carefully staged narrative designed to get real buyers to step in and fund the operation.
The $TG team didn’t try to create a hyper-inflated token price like many other scams. Instead, they went for a slow, believable rise. They bought from new wallets at intervals that made it look like the token was just climbing steadily. And each green candle on the chart was like a little whisper from the coin: “I’m totally real and going places.” To anyone who might have been observing the token from a distance, this was just a new coin gaining traction.
Throughout this time, the developers were discreetly cashing out. They sold small amounts through controlled wallets to maintain appearances and avoid triggering a market panic. It was a psychological game—reward early believers just enough to keep them optimistic, while ensuring that the exit door remained open for the insiders.
With the chart’s continued rise and Crypto Twitter’s Nasdaq-like vibes, ever more investors poured into the ethereal dollar. This was the clean-it-just-left-in-a-luxury-car plan that some folks will even see as a perversion of the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
Then arrived the dump.
No alerts. No facade. Simply a sharp and aggressive sell-off that plummeted the token into a nosedive. The very wallet that had taken part in the initial, well-planned purchases—wallet-4KGFJFxUi3mCHHCjV6Evv27EwfcLQPAb1iDMSyBwf2Xv—was subsequently utilized to commence the slam, underscoring its involvement in the larger operation.
The not-a-panic-collapse was the closing act in a long-play rug pull, and not a carefully executed one at that. The steps taken were too obvious, to the point that even a couple of crypto nerds snickering over the weekend at pictures of Eduardo Saverin’s face in the May 2020 issue of Time and teddy bears with Salvador Dalí mustaches knew something was up.
This was the weekend that the heist got involved.
The fall of $TG serves as a sobering reminder that not every token claiming to offer utility is built on integrity. Sometimes, the most dangerous rugs are the ones that don’t look like rugs at all. Investors are urged to look beyond surface-level tokenomics, to monitor wallet behaviors, and to remain skeptical of too-perfect chart patterns.
In an area where innovation frequently outstrips regulation, maintaining constant surveillance is the next best thing to having the state intervene. Surveillance allows us to see through the smoke and mirrors that fast-paced scammers and con artists throw up to conceal what they’re really up to.
Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.
Follow us on Twitter @themerklehash to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, and Metaverse news!
Once more, Ethereum is commanding the spotlight as fresh figures indicate that the amount of…
The ecosystem on Arbitrum keeps flaunting its robust foundations, with a steady incline in the…
Once again, major market players are focusing on Ethereum. The whale activity surrounding the second-largest…
It has been a tumultuous week for the artificial intelligence sector in crypto. Sharp valuation…
Following a brief stint of dormancy, the BSC Foundation is back in action, reestablishing its strategic…
In the rapidly changing field of cryptocurrency trading, technical analysis has reigned for a long…