Categories: CryptoNews

Stick To Cash For Anonymous Payments, Rather Than Bitcoin

When it comes to sending and receiving payments, a lot of people want to do so in an anonymous manner. Unfortunately, many people feel drawn to Bitcoin for this kind of purpose, but as it turns out there is no viable way to do so properly. But is there a need for anonymous payments?

Anonymous Payments Are Almost Impossible

Accepting an anonymous payment is nearly impossible these days unless you use cash to transfer value. Unlike most other solutions available in the world today, cash has inherent anonymous traits, as no personal information is exchanged when making cash transfers.

Bitcoin, on the other hand, is anything but anonymous, as all of the transactions are publicly recorded on the blockchain. Anyone in the world can see every transaction on the blockchain in real-time, and see where funds are going to at any given time. Even though this does not include personal information either, there is an origin and destination for all funds that anyone can trace, rendering Bitcoin not anonymous.

In fact, some of the most common payment methods we use today are not anonymous by nature either. Credit and debit cards are becoming the new norm all over the world these days, which had also led to many card information breaches throughout the years. When making such payment, all types of personal information is disclosed, including addresses, names, and the payment information itself. Not the most secure method by any means.

Related Post

Some people might argue that mobile payments can be pretty anonymous, but they would be mistaken in that regard as well. Most mobile payment solutions rely on traditional payment methods such as credit and debit cards, rendering the entire anonymity principle moot. There is no such thing as an anonymous payment method other than cash right now.

At the same time, consumers have to ask themselves if they need anonymous payment solutions to begin with. It only makes sense to try and be as privacy-centric as possible when sending funds, but when it comes to receiving money, there should be no need for anonymity at all. After all, why would a recipient of money want to hide his identity? This makes any business look suspicious from the get-go, and will not install any confidence with potential customers.

Source: Reddit

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Justin Sun Pledges $SUN Buybacks With SunPerp Revenue

Justin Sun, CEO of TRON DAO, has just made one of his biggest announcements of…

2 days ago

$BNB Hits $1,000 ATH as Market Cap Reaches $145.7B

$BNB has broken through a historic milestone. The token surged past $1,000, setting a new…

3 days ago

Top 5 DeFi Tokens Less Than $1 Price Mark To Watch In September

Decentralized finance (DeFi) has continued to disrupt traditional financial systems, offering permissionless access to lending,…

3 days ago

Solana Data Insights: App Revenues Hit $193.5M in August, Up 126% YoY

Solana’s app economy posted another breakout month. Total application revenues surged to $193.5 million in…

4 days ago

Sharps Technology Aligns with Bonk for Treasury Staking and Solana Growth

Sharps Technology (NASDAQ: STSS) is making a major move in the Solana ecosystem. The company,…

4 days ago

Understand AR In the Context of LivLive’s Game Layer for Reality Ecosystem

LivLive is redefining augmented reality (AR) gaming by turning real-world actions into measurable value for…

5 days ago