Categories: CryptoNews

Smart Contracts May Need To Play By Dumb Rules

Smart contracts seem to become the norm these days, although there is an argument to be made as to how “smart” these contracts truly are. While there is a certain attribute of efficiency to be gained, there is the question of whether people can make these contracts behave as intended in the real world.

Enforcing a Contract to be Smart

That will be the biggest hurdle to overcome in the real world, as smart contracts can turn out to be complex layers upon one another. To most people, the intricacies of smart contracts are well above their pay grade, nor will they care as long as everything works as expected. But enforcing everything works as intended is a different matter altogether.

One way to solve this problem, according to Nigel Farmer, is to add metadata or a description to smart contracts, containing specific details to enforce the boundaries of this agreement. Additionally, the information will need to be validated independently to ensure the code will execute what is to be expected, and nothing else.

But there is another issue that will need to be addressed, as it’s hard to trust the creator or provider of the smart contract itself. Although this technology is designed to create a trustless ecosystem, in the long run, there is a likely chance smart contract issuer risk becomes a new “term” in the early days of adopting this concept.

Related Post

Moreover, will smart contracts play nice with existing systems and infrastructure? Legacy systems are not exactly known for being compatible with disruptive technology, and the gap between both infrastructures will need to be bridged in a convenient and cost-efficient manner. Otherwise, this technology will never be properly embraced by enterprises and governments.

Although smart contracts are designed to cut out the middleman of the agreement, there may be oversight needed in the early stages of embracing this technology. A contract with bad code hitting the blockchain could cause a lot of damage unless detection safeguards are put in place. It is always best to prevent than to cure, and developers have their work cut out for them.

Source: Software AG

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

10 Trusted Cloud Mining Platforms to Earn Free Bitcoin Daily in 2026

  Cloud mining continues to gain massive traction as 2026 inches closer. In tough economic…

18 hours ago

Jupiter Pushes Onchain Finance Forward With Its Biggest Upgrade Wave Yet

Solana Breakpoint wasn’t just another conference this year. It doubled as a stage for Jupiter…

1 day ago

Ripple Payments Lands First European Bank With AMINA Bank AG

Ripple has scored a major regulatory milestone in Europe. AMINA Bank AG, a Swiss-regulated digital…

1 day ago

a16z’s 2026 Crypto Vision: Stablecoins Surge, Tokenization Grows, and Asia Becomes the Next Battleground

a16z just dropped its annual report, and the message is clear: crypto isn’t slowing down.…

2 days ago

Ethereum Activates BPO-1 Upgrade, Boosting Blob Capacity and Expanding the Network’s Scaling Roadmap

Ethereum has activated BPO-1, a protocol adjustment that increases blob capacity per block from 6…

2 days ago

CryptoBench: AI Meets DeFi, Head-On

CryptoBench just landed. Developed by ChainOpera AI and Princeton AI Lab, under the guidance of…

4 days ago