Categories: CryptoNews

Smart Contracts May Need To Play By Dumb Rules

Smart contracts seem to become the norm these days, although there is an argument to be made as to how “smart” these contracts truly are. While there is a certain attribute of efficiency to be gained, there is the question of whether people can make these contracts behave as intended in the real world.

Enforcing a Contract to be Smart

That will be the biggest hurdle to overcome in the real world, as smart contracts can turn out to be complex layers upon one another. To most people, the intricacies of smart contracts are well above their pay grade, nor will they care as long as everything works as expected. But enforcing everything works as intended is a different matter altogether.

One way to solve this problem, according to Nigel Farmer, is to add metadata or a description to smart contracts, containing specific details to enforce the boundaries of this agreement. Additionally, the information will need to be validated independently to ensure the code will execute what is to be expected, and nothing else.

But there is another issue that will need to be addressed, as it’s hard to trust the creator or provider of the smart contract itself. Although this technology is designed to create a trustless ecosystem, in the long run, there is a likely chance smart contract issuer risk becomes a new “term” in the early days of adopting this concept.

Related Post

Moreover, will smart contracts play nice with existing systems and infrastructure? Legacy systems are not exactly known for being compatible with disruptive technology, and the gap between both infrastructures will need to be bridged in a convenient and cost-efficient manner. Otherwise, this technology will never be properly embraced by enterprises and governments.

Although smart contracts are designed to cut out the middleman of the agreement, there may be oversight needed in the early stages of embracing this technology. A contract with bad code hitting the blockchain could cause a lot of damage unless detection safeguards are put in place. It is always best to prevent than to cure, and developers have their work cut out for them.

Source: Software AG

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

The Calculated Collapse of $TG: How a “Utility” Token Was Engineered for a Rug Pull

In the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency, new tokens launch daily, each one a shining beacon…

1 day ago

Staked Ethereum Hits Record High as Whale Accumulation Signals Bullish Long-Term Sentiment

Once more, Ethereum is commanding the spotlight as fresh figures indicate that the amount of…

1 day ago

Arbitrum Sees Surge in Protocol Revenue and EIP-7702 Adoption Following ArbOS 40 Upgrade

The ecosystem on Arbitrum keeps flaunting its robust foundations, with a steady incline in the…

1 day ago

Ethereum Whale Accumulation Surges as Long-Term Confidence Outweighs Short-Term Volatility

Once again, major market players are focusing on Ethereum. The whale activity surrounding the second-largest…

4 days ago

Week in AI: Fartcoin Steals the Spotlight Amid Market Turmoil

It has been a tumultuous week for the artificial intelligence sector in crypto. Sharp valuation…

5 days ago

BSC Foundation Resumes Strategic Accumulation: VIXBT, CAKE, LISTA, and MOOLAH Under Spotlight

Following a brief stint of dormancy, the BSC Foundation is back in action, reestablishing its strategic…

6 days ago