Categories: CryptoNews

Segregated Witness Merge Request Sparks New Debate Among Bitcoin users

Segregated Witness has been touted as the proper solution to solving the Bitcoin block size problem. The Bitcoin Core developers have thoroughly tested the solution and recently merged it with the Bitcoin Core development branch on GitHub. A release for the updated client was not provided at this time, though.

Segregated Witness Is Coming Soon

Bitcoin enthusiasts have been waiting for the release of Segregated Witness for quite some time now. Solving the Bitcoin block size problem should have been done many months ago, and the process has taken longer than expected. Initially, developers assumed the solution would be ready by April 2016.

Unfortunately, that did not happen, albeit hardly anyone will complain about the more thorough testing of this solution. Then again, a delay by several months has caused the community to sit through another round of network congestion about a week ago. Now that the merge request has been approved, things are shifting into the next gear, though.

The Bitcoin community on Reddit is not sharing the enthusiasm of the developers, though. Some people feel that Segwit is such a massive change to the protocol architecture that it technically does not resemble Satoshi’s creation anymore. While the supply cap of Bitcoin is not impacted by Segwit, it is not unlikely that situation may change through a similar soft fork in the future. Albeit this may sound unrealistic, one cannot discount the possibility either.

Related Post

Moreover, there are some questions as to whether or not a real currency test should be performed before integrating Segregated Witness into Bitcoin. Charlie Lee, the creator of Litecoin, has indicated he would like to port SegWit to LTC in the future. Testing it in that environment might be a good idea as it can give Bitcoin Core devs valuable feedback and work out any remaining bugs or kinks.

Segregated Witness has turned into something more than a solution to solve the Bitcoin block size debate, though. Several malleability vulnerabilities are addressed as part of this implementation. But several Reddit users are not too happy with this solution in general. Caution is a positive thing, and thorough testing through a different currency may not be a bad idea.

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

The Calculated Collapse of $TG: How a “Utility” Token Was Engineered for a Rug Pull

In the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency, new tokens launch daily, each one a shining beacon…

1 day ago

Staked Ethereum Hits Record High as Whale Accumulation Signals Bullish Long-Term Sentiment

Once more, Ethereum is commanding the spotlight as fresh figures indicate that the amount of…

1 day ago

Arbitrum Sees Surge in Protocol Revenue and EIP-7702 Adoption Following ArbOS 40 Upgrade

The ecosystem on Arbitrum keeps flaunting its robust foundations, with a steady incline in the…

1 day ago

Ethereum Whale Accumulation Surges as Long-Term Confidence Outweighs Short-Term Volatility

Once again, major market players are focusing on Ethereum. The whale activity surrounding the second-largest…

4 days ago

Week in AI: Fartcoin Steals the Spotlight Amid Market Turmoil

It has been a tumultuous week for the artificial intelligence sector in crypto. Sharp valuation…

5 days ago

BSC Foundation Resumes Strategic Accumulation: VIXBT, CAKE, LISTA, and MOOLAH Under Spotlight

Following a brief stint of dormancy, the BSC Foundation is back in action, reestablishing its strategic…

7 days ago