Categories: CryptoNews

Only 1.5% of LocalBitcoins Transactions Are Local Trades

LocalBitcoins is one of the few cryptocurrency platforms promoting peer-to-peer interaction. Users can meet face-to-face with other Bitcoin enthusiasts to complete trades. But are we using the platform all wrong? Statistics indicate various regions of the world only see 1.5% of all trades as person-to-person interactions.

Lack Of P2P Interactions on LocalBitcoins

On paper, the LocalBitcoins platform is how the future of Bitcoin trading should look like. Connecting buyers and sellers directly, without an intermediary holding the funds.  Users can meet with buyers and sellers in person to complete the transaction. Not only does this allow for a more “real” interaction, but it also gives users a chance to meet more people.

Meeting with random strangers to complete a financial transaction is not without risks, though. Over the years, some of the LocalBitcoins transactions have gone astray, with people being held at gunpoint for their Bitcoin balance. Although these are usually isolated incidents, it also highlights the risk of peer-to-peer transactions in real life.



Whether or not these risks are to blame for lack of local trades, remains to be seen. LocalBitcoins has seen increasing volumes in nearly every country on the planet so far. However, only 1.5% of these trades are local transactions, which is a rather disappointing number.

Related Post

Some regions may see a higher or lower number of local trades, though. In Europe, meeting in-person to buy or sell Bitcoin is pretty much non-existent. South America, on the other hand, is home to more intimate communities, where peer-to-peer transactions are more common. Then again, there is still the risk factor to take into account, which may be much higher in South America compared to Europe.

All of this begs the question whether or not we do not appreciate the value of what LocalBitcoins has to offer. What started out as a social trading platform has become a directory where users can select a Bitcoin seller or buyer, and use their bank account to complete transactions. Although there is nothing wrong with it, this is not the way the platform was intended to be used.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

The Calculated Collapse of $TG: How a “Utility” Token Was Engineered for a Rug Pull

In the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency, new tokens launch daily, each one a shining beacon…

1 day ago

Staked Ethereum Hits Record High as Whale Accumulation Signals Bullish Long-Term Sentiment

Once more, Ethereum is commanding the spotlight as fresh figures indicate that the amount of…

1 day ago

Arbitrum Sees Surge in Protocol Revenue and EIP-7702 Adoption Following ArbOS 40 Upgrade

The ecosystem on Arbitrum keeps flaunting its robust foundations, with a steady incline in the…

1 day ago

Ethereum Whale Accumulation Surges as Long-Term Confidence Outweighs Short-Term Volatility

Once again, major market players are focusing on Ethereum. The whale activity surrounding the second-largest…

4 days ago

Week in AI: Fartcoin Steals the Spotlight Amid Market Turmoil

It has been a tumultuous week for the artificial intelligence sector in crypto. Sharp valuation…

5 days ago

BSC Foundation Resumes Strategic Accumulation: VIXBT, CAKE, LISTA, and MOOLAH Under Spotlight

Following a brief stint of dormancy, the BSC Foundation is back in action, reestablishing its strategic…

7 days ago