Categories: CryptoNews

Not Every Bank Needs Their Own Private Blockchain

It is no secret that every financial entity in the world wants to create their distributed ledger. Rather than embracing an open standard, banks want to control everything that goes on with blockchain technology. A lot of institutions are forking the Ethereum blockchain to create a permissioned ledger. That is rather interesting, considering that there are so many blockchain providers out there.

Everybody Gets Their Own Blockchain!

The primary purpose of distributed ledgers it to share information across a network with other participants. In the Bitcoin world that information is shared with millions of people in real-time. Information is accessible by anyone in the world and does not require special privileges or permission. It is an ecosystem where trust is not an issue, so to speak.

Financial institutions do not like this open and public nature of the Bitcoin blockchain, nor do they like to see everything on the Ethereum blockchain either. Instead, they fork the latter and create their own permissioned and private ledgers. Only verified participants can see the information on this network. In a way, this renders the whole idea of distributed ledgers completely useless, as it still requires a trust factor.

To make matters progressively worse, every bank and their dog seem to be creating their blockchain these days. Even though the R3 consortium has many of the top global banks under its umbrella, institutions continue to explore other options as well–not that there’s anything wrong with that, as there is no need to put all eggs in the same basket.

Related Post

What is a problem, however, is how all of these different ledgers are supposed to communicate with one another. Blockchain technology is designed to create universal systems that work for everyone. Private ledgers may only work with one bank and a handful of its partners. Anyone dealing with other financial institutions and that group of banks will have to rely on legacy systems to complete transactions.

It is difficult enough to make blockchain technology work with existing legacy systems. It would only make matters worse if every bank had its own blockchain; this is no solution.  Instead, this approach only strengthens the need for an open standard that can be used by everyone. It is doubtful whether institutions will see it that way, as they want control over everything at all times.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

10 Trusted Cloud Mining Platforms to Earn Free Bitcoin Daily in 2026

  Cloud mining continues to gain massive traction as 2026 inches closer. In tough economic…

13 hours ago

Jupiter Pushes Onchain Finance Forward With Its Biggest Upgrade Wave Yet

Solana Breakpoint wasn’t just another conference this year. It doubled as a stage for Jupiter…

1 day ago

Ripple Payments Lands First European Bank With AMINA Bank AG

Ripple has scored a major regulatory milestone in Europe. AMINA Bank AG, a Swiss-regulated digital…

1 day ago

a16z’s 2026 Crypto Vision: Stablecoins Surge, Tokenization Grows, and Asia Becomes the Next Battleground

a16z just dropped its annual report, and the message is clear: crypto isn’t slowing down.…

2 days ago

Ethereum Activates BPO-1 Upgrade, Boosting Blob Capacity and Expanding the Network’s Scaling Roadmap

Ethereum has activated BPO-1, a protocol adjustment that increases blob capacity per block from 6…

2 days ago

CryptoBench: AI Meets DeFi, Head-On

CryptoBench just landed. Developed by ChainOpera AI and Princeton AI Lab, under the guidance of…

4 days ago