Categories: CryptoNews

Is BitGo To Blame For The Bitfinex Bitcoin Theft?

In light of the recent Bitfinex attack, BitGo revealed a rather interesting statement. The company claimed their own investigation has yielded no evidence of a breach of any of their servers during the Bitfinex attack. This is rather strange, as all of the missing funds was drained from multisignature wallets, which should be secured by BitGo’s technology.

A Rather Worrisome Scenario For BitGo?

The way most people look at this statement is as follows: BitGo secures BitFinex’s cold storage but did not record a breach. However, the funds were stolen from multisignature wallets. If there was no breach, to begin with, how did the funds go missing then? A rather worrisome option to consider for sure.

While no one is saying Bitfinex is not to blame for this hack, it also goes to show BitGo may not be as secure as most people assumed at first. The company specializes in doing one job, yet some people feel they utterly failed at doing just that. Some people even go as far as referring to this incident as “allowing customers to implement a solution that allows for theft”. If this is something that can be legally proven, BitGo may find themselves in hot waters very soon.



This matter becomes more intriguing when taking into account how every Bitfinex transaction has to be co-signed by BitGo. If their service was not breached, it is unlikely their private key was issued to steal the funds. This leaves very few other options on the table, albeit one should not exclude an inside job either at this stage.

Related Post

What is perhaps even more worrisome is how there does not seem to be any trace of the stolen funds. No one has been able to find out the specific transaction yet at this stage. Moreover, this makes it impossible to determine where the funds are going. Said information may be revealed at a later date, though.

But there is more, as some Twitter users are wondering what limits BitGo has implemented for multisignature withdrawals. A total sum of nearly 120,000 Bitcoin in one transaction is rather significant, and can hardly be warranted by any legitimate action. Large withdrawals such as those should raise plenty of red flags for BitGo, yet for some reason, the company did not find this request unusual.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

The Calculated Collapse of $TG: How a “Utility” Token Was Engineered for a Rug Pull

In the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency, new tokens launch daily, each one a shining beacon…

21 hours ago

Staked Ethereum Hits Record High as Whale Accumulation Signals Bullish Long-Term Sentiment

Once more, Ethereum is commanding the spotlight as fresh figures indicate that the amount of…

22 hours ago

Arbitrum Sees Surge in Protocol Revenue and EIP-7702 Adoption Following ArbOS 40 Upgrade

The ecosystem on Arbitrum keeps flaunting its robust foundations, with a steady incline in the…

22 hours ago

Ethereum Whale Accumulation Surges as Long-Term Confidence Outweighs Short-Term Volatility

Once again, major market players are focusing on Ethereum. The whale activity surrounding the second-largest…

4 days ago

Week in AI: Fartcoin Steals the Spotlight Amid Market Turmoil

It has been a tumultuous week for the artificial intelligence sector in crypto. Sharp valuation…

5 days ago

BSC Foundation Resumes Strategic Accumulation: VIXBT, CAKE, LISTA, and MOOLAH Under Spotlight

Following a brief stint of dormancy, the BSC Foundation is back in action, reestablishing its strategic…

6 days ago