Categories: News

How The Bitcoin Transaction Fee Relates To Network Confirmations

One of the issues a lot of people have with the Bitcoin ecosystem is how they have to wait for transaction confirmations by the network. As most people are well aware, this can take anywhere from minutes to hours before a transaction gets the full six confirmations. But some companies are adapting their strategy, and Betcoin is looking to base the network confirmations needed for the transaction fee paid by the sender.

Also read: MAIDSafe Technical Analysis for 02/17/2016 – Important Pivot Levels

Lower Transaction Fee Means A Longer Wait Period

People who have been keeping an eye on their outgoing Bitcoin transactions may have noticed how there is a specific fee associated with each transfer. In most cases, this fee will be the standard value of 0.0001 BTC, regardless of how big the amount wass they initially moved.

But when someone sends a much smaller Bitcoin payment, the transaction fee is less than 0.0001 BTC. It only seems to make sense for companies dealing with fractional amounts of Bitcoin to wait for more network confirmations on small deposits, whereas higher value transfers would only need one or two conformations, for example.

Betcoin is one of the companies basing their deposit speed on the fee associated with the transfer. One Reddit user pointed out how his transfer had to wait for six full network confirmations, as that particular transaction fee was well below 0.0001 BTC. One might argue that not much harm can be done with such a small deposit, but some companies are adapting their policies in this regard.

Related Post

Needless to say, this decision can be both annoying and a positive sign at the same time. For people looking to deposit small amounts to their Betcoin account, any transaction with a fee below 0.0001 BTC might be annoyed by the wait. But at the same time, those players who want to send over large sums of money will have to wait for one confirmation, a slong as their transaction fee meets the threshold.

Accepting unconfirmed transactions by the Bitcoin network holds a certain risk for any company dealing with digital currency. Requiring a minimum transaction fee prevents platforms from coming under attack by low-fee attacks. Double spending after one network confirmation is rather unusual, though, and a fine balance has to be struck between verifying genuine deposits and serving the customer in time.

Source: Reddit

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

10 Trusted Cloud Mining Platforms to Earn Free Bitcoin Daily in 2026

  Cloud mining continues to gain massive traction as 2026 inches closer. In tough economic…

12 hours ago

Jupiter Pushes Onchain Finance Forward With Its Biggest Upgrade Wave Yet

Solana Breakpoint wasn’t just another conference this year. It doubled as a stage for Jupiter…

1 day ago

Ripple Payments Lands First European Bank With AMINA Bank AG

Ripple has scored a major regulatory milestone in Europe. AMINA Bank AG, a Swiss-regulated digital…

1 day ago

a16z’s 2026 Crypto Vision: Stablecoins Surge, Tokenization Grows, and Asia Becomes the Next Battleground

a16z just dropped its annual report, and the message is clear: crypto isn’t slowing down.…

2 days ago

Ethereum Activates BPO-1 Upgrade, Boosting Blob Capacity and Expanding the Network’s Scaling Roadmap

Ethereum has activated BPO-1, a protocol adjustment that increases blob capacity per block from 6…

2 days ago

CryptoBench: AI Meets DeFi, Head-On

CryptoBench just landed. Developed by ChainOpera AI and Princeton AI Lab, under the guidance of…

4 days ago