Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police Favors Enforcable Decryption Laws

The topic of privacy and encryption is still being kicked around by government officials these days. Notably the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police is for forcing users to decrypt their communication and devices. The CACP voted to support legal changes which would permit judges to “compel encryption key holders” to reveal it to law enforcement.

Encryption Does Not Make It Harder To Solve Crime

It is not the first, nor the last time; law enforcement agencies want to compel users into decrypting sensitive data. These stories have been circulating for quite some time now, and they will continue to do for the foreseeable future. While it is true criminals operate online in an anonymous manner, decrypting those tools is not the answer to solving crimes.

Canadian law currently offers no provision for legally demand suspects to provide passwords or encryption keys during an investigation. While the CACP is for creating such a law,  privacy advocates will oppose the concept at every turn. As they rightfully should, since law enforcement has no business in tracking anyone’s online communication.

As was to be expected, the CACP cited an internal report arguing how law enforcement has a harder time lawfully accessing and examining digital evidence. That doesn’t justify demanding a law that will force anyone to decrypt their information, though, as it would only lead to more consumer privacy violations. Then again, that seems to suit law enforcement agencies around the world just fine, as they could not care less about individual privacy.



Related Post

It did not take long for the first pushback to occur. This proposal has been labelled as “wildly disproportionate” by OpenMedia spokesperson David Christopher. Although user privacy is not a constitutional right by any means, there should be no legal precedent for invading anyone’s privacy based on a hunch. If there is no substantial evidence against someone, law enforcement agencies should have no grounds to ask for decryption keys either.

Finding a balance between respecting user privacy and solving cyber crime will be a difficult task. Then again, one could argue law enforcement is too quickly resorting to less legal matters to obtain the evidence they need. Perhaps it is time to rethink the whole strategy regarding cyber crime and rebuild it from the ground up, rather than demanding invasion privacy laws.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Justin Sun Pledges $SUN Buybacks With SunPerp Revenue

Justin Sun, CEO of TRON DAO, has just made one of his biggest announcements of…

2 days ago

$BNB Hits $1,000 ATH as Market Cap Reaches $145.7B

$BNB has broken through a historic milestone. The token surged past $1,000, setting a new…

3 days ago

Top 5 DeFi Tokens Less Than $1 Price Mark To Watch In September

Decentralized finance (DeFi) has continued to disrupt traditional financial systems, offering permissionless access to lending,…

3 days ago

Solana Data Insights: App Revenues Hit $193.5M in August, Up 126% YoY

Solana’s app economy posted another breakout month. Total application revenues surged to $193.5 million in…

4 days ago

Sharps Technology Aligns with Bonk for Treasury Staking and Solana Growth

Sharps Technology (NASDAQ: STSS) is making a major move in the Solana ecosystem. The company,…

4 days ago

Understand AR In the Context of LivLive’s Game Layer for Reality Ecosystem

LivLive is redefining augmented reality (AR) gaming by turning real-world actions into measurable value for…

5 days ago