Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police Favors Enforcable Decryption Laws

The topic of privacy and encryption is still being kicked around by government officials these days. Notably the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police is for forcing users to decrypt their communication and devices. The CACP voted to support legal changes which would permit judges to “compel encryption key holders” to reveal it to law enforcement.

Encryption Does Not Make It Harder To Solve Crime

It is not the first, nor the last time; law enforcement agencies want to compel users into decrypting sensitive data. These stories have been circulating for quite some time now, and they will continue to do for the foreseeable future. While it is true criminals operate online in an anonymous manner, decrypting those tools is not the answer to solving crimes.

Canadian law currently offers no provision for legally demand suspects to provide passwords or encryption keys during an investigation. While the CACP is for creating such a law,  privacy advocates will oppose the concept at every turn. As they rightfully should, since law enforcement has no business in tracking anyone’s online communication.

As was to be expected, the CACP cited an internal report arguing how law enforcement has a harder time lawfully accessing and examining digital evidence. That doesn’t justify demanding a law that will force anyone to decrypt their information, though, as it would only lead to more consumer privacy violations. Then again, that seems to suit law enforcement agencies around the world just fine, as they could not care less about individual privacy.



Related Post

It did not take long for the first pushback to occur. This proposal has been labelled as “wildly disproportionate” by OpenMedia spokesperson David Christopher. Although user privacy is not a constitutional right by any means, there should be no legal precedent for invading anyone’s privacy based on a hunch. If there is no substantial evidence against someone, law enforcement agencies should have no grounds to ask for decryption keys either.

Finding a balance between respecting user privacy and solving cyber crime will be a difficult task. Then again, one could argue law enforcement is too quickly resorting to less legal matters to obtain the evidence they need. Perhaps it is time to rethink the whole strategy regarding cyber crime and rebuild it from the ground up, rather than demanding invasion privacy laws.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Step Finance Confirms Major Treasury Breach On Solana

Step Finance has disclosed a significant security incident involving its protocol-owned funds, marking one of…

1 day ago

Crypto Hacks Surge Again As January Losses Hit $86 Million

The crypto industry is once again grappling with a rising wave of security breaches as…

1 day ago

Vitalik Buterin Says Creator Coins Miss The Real Problem

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is once again challenging a popular crypto narrative, this time around…

1 day ago

Step Finance Hit By Major Treasury Breach

Shockwaves moved through the Solana ecosystem after DeFi dashboard and portfolio platform Step Finance confirmed…

4 days ago

Tether Caps A Record Year With Explosive Profit Growth

Tether has released its Q4 2025 quarterly attestation, and the numbers confirm what much of…

4 days ago

Lighter EVM Marks A Major Shift From Trading Engine To Full-Stack DeFi Platform

Lighter is officially stepping beyond its roots as a high-performance perpetual DEX with the launch…

4 days ago