Arbitrum’s Timeboost Auctions Show Signs of Stabilization Amid Market Calm

For the last fortnight, the timeboost auctions on Arbitrum have settled into a steady rhythm, generating revenue of about $40,000 every day.

This is a significant change from earlier in the year when we saw more volatility in the daily auction revenues, with some days generating quite a bit more and some days generating less. Auctions for timeboosts, which allow users to pay for priority access to Arbitrum’s blockchain state, have always been a vital revenue stream for the Arbitrum network.

This recent auction revenue plateau appears to mirror a broader decline in market volatility. During periods of heightened market turbulence, traders and automated systems seek quicker and more reliable transaction processing and drive up the priority access auction bids. But as the market has calmed in recent days, that auction access demand has settled down, too, taking the bid amounts and revenues along for the ride to a more consistent and predictable place.

Winning Bids Now Represent Less of Arbitrum’s Revenue Pie

A vital statistic to monitor while assessing the vitality and competitiveness of these auctions is the proportion of total income that winning auction bids make up. Last week, winning bids made up about 60 percent of Arbitrum’s total income, highlighting the truly central part that these priority auctions play.

Recently, this number has fallen to just around 40 percent, which shows that the auction dominance in the network’s overall revenue structure is pulling back. On the other hand, this could also mean that the network is just becoming more diversified in terms of revenue sources, with base transaction fees and mechanisms akin to them becoming relatively more important.

Here, likely _contributors_ are the cooling of volatility and reduced urgency for expedited transactions. In calmer conditions, the cost-benefit analysis for bidders changes. To put it another way, in these less favorable conditions for state access, who has the lowered advantage for paying premiums? Traders trying to time price swings, as network congestion and other issues also work against them.

Bid Spread Widens, Hinting at Auction Dynamics

Another clear sign is the gap between the highest and second-highest bids in the timeboost auctions. In recent weeks, this gap has shrunk to about 20 percent, which means we have a healthy, competitive auction environment where multiple bidders want to access the express lane. This is signaled by a nice, tight gap. And in this context, a tight gap is a good thing. It is also a sign that the express lane access is being valued appropriately. The wider the gap, the more likely it is that the auction price reflects a less useful signal.

The current spread is approximately 40 percent, and it has been relatively stable in that neighborhood. This has been interpreted by some as a sign that a single player is now dominant in the auction. That is evidently the case out to about 40 percent of the area in this chart—area in the sense of part of the auction that seems now to be under the control of one player. That player, apparently, is us.

When one organization essentially monopolizes preceding access by putting in unreasonably high bids, you have to wonder whether this revenue mechanism is as decentralized and accessible as we pretend it is. If it is, the next question is: how long can it last? (For now, at least, it’s probably a good thing that we can’t see the bids in the way we can with a stock market, where pricing is presumably determined by some kind of supply-and-demand equilibrium.)

Looking Ahead: Implications for Arbitrum’s Revenue and Ecosystem

Timeboost auction revenues have leveled off at about $40,000 per day. This number is weaker than one would hope for a maturing product but is consistent with current market conditions. Volatility has bled urgency and incentive for paying premium fees out of the system, and less auction pressure means widening bid spreads and a declining share of winning bids.

The challenges and the opportunities that this fast-evolving landscape represents for the Arbitrum ecosystem are both clear and many. More stable and predictable auction revenues could enable much-improved financial planning and much-enhanced ecosystem sustainability. But less competitive auctions, if dominated by a single player, could dull the incentive for far wider participation and, therefore, hit the ecosystem right where it lives—its alleged commitment to decentralization.

As the network keeps expanding and capturing an array of users, it will be vital to uphold the current balanced priority auction system. The alternative—having too few or too many users in priority auction system—wouldn’t be good for the network and its users. If something is unhealthy with the system, it could compromise a valuable revenue stream while also promoting unfairness. So, the team must be doing something right to have the current, working condition in place. Beyond what can be done with healthy dynamics inside priority auction system, the team could also explore the idea of helping more bidders participate.

Currently, the data suggests that Arbitrum’s timeboost auctions are experiencing a phase of relative calm. This seems to be very much correlated with an easing of overall market volatility. It will be important to watch how this all unfolds—whether it stays calm or starts to get interesting again—as we move back into a phase of rising market volatility.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @themerklehash to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, and Metaverse news!